IT spending
ITWeb Brainstorm CIO Banquet

Pandemic forces top South African CIOs to spend more

The majority of local chief information officers have increased their IT spending since the pandemic hit, survey reveals.

By Jove! A pulse!

After several false dawns, the long-awaited recovery of IT spending and markets is on its way. But though there is most certainly a pulse, it remains weak.For the most part, recent financial results of JSE-listed IT companies tell the same story of flat revenues, deteriorating margins and prolonged restructuring exercises that have defined the industry since the beginning of 2000. But, among privately owned firms and venture capital investors, a spirit of renewed optimism is emerging.Brainstorm canvassed views from a range of industry players, including venture capital and private equity firms, software integrators and hardware suppliers, to gauge how the IT industry is doing at the grassroots level. The consensus is that the market is looking the healthiest it has in nearly four years, although most observers stop short of describing current conditions as the start of a full-blown recovery.There are several encouraging signs: hardware unit shipments are growing, venture capital deal flow seems to be improving and systems integrators are starting to win large projects again. Tempering the optimistic outlook is concern about the impact the strengthening rand will have on IT suppliers and their customers in the export-driven mining and manufacturing sectors.A recently released BMI-TechKnowledge analysis, South African Corporate IT User Trends, which surveyed more than half of the top 200 companies in the country, found that little growth was expected in business processes and solutions, with more companies sounding negative on outsourcing plans than reporting new plans to start or expand their outsourcing deals.While this spending reticence persists, however, significant areas are showing more optimistic signs - particularly IP telephony and mobile computing. The research house says companies that can offer solutions rather than just technology are likely to be able to take advantage of these trends.Rand is good for customersThe market for PC hardware and peripherals is starting to show some evidence of life again, says Guy Whitcroft, MD of Tarsus Technologies, one of the largest privately owned computer distributors in South Africa."The picture isn`t gloomy by any means. Next year is going to be a good one in dollar and unit shipment terms, but it`s hard to guess what the picture will look like in rands. I`m cautiously optimistic that things will be better next year than they have been for a while," Whitcroft adds.He does caution, however, that money is still tight in the channel and that rand-denominated sales will probably be hit by the dramatic strengthening of the currency over the past year."Rates, rent, insurance, telephones and so on are all rand-denominated and now chew up a higher percentage of dollar sales than before. To keep sales measured in rands constant, you need to sell more in dollars than you did last year. For people who`ve become accustomed to the rand depreciating at an average of 15 percent a year, it`s a difficult reality to manage," says Whitcroft.The rand`s strength might pressure margins, but customers could be spurred into accelerating their spending plans by the increased buying and bargaining power they wield.Says Rowan Williams, director of capital at private equity firm i capital fund managers: "Our fund has maintained quite a heavy weighting towards IT, and as a whole the portfolio is performing quite well at the moment. We see an uptick in demand [for IT products and services] in the year ahead - the market is definitely starting to loosen up."Mike Johns of Archway Venture Partners is less sanguine. "We`ve all been talking about an upturn for the last three years, based on little more than hope. The budgets of the companies in our portfolios do reflect an anticipated upswing, but then the same was true of the previous three years," he says.Look to big daddyIncreased government spending on IT is one factor helping to spur a mild recovery in the market, says Rudolf Pretorius, a partner at Treacle Venture Partners. "There`s a bit of infrastructure spending in the corporate market, but the real excitement is in government and parastatals. SITA seems to be getting its act together, which is creating new opportunities for IT companies," he adds.Financial services companies are also starting to spend on IT again as they prepare to become compliant with new regulations and industry standards such as Basel II and the new EMV credit card standard, says Williams.There`s still venture capital available for new and growing IT businesses from local private equity firms, although most of these investors are conservative and picky about the companies they provide with funding.Areas investors expect will yield high growth in the coming year include call centre outsourcing businesses that focus on the local and international markets, information security, enterprise resource planning software and services for the public sector, web services (particularly the Microsoft .Net environment), and infrastructure and software projects in the rest of Africa.A common complaint, however, is that there is still a dearth of well-managed, quality companies to invest in. "Our biggest frustration is that we`re under-invested - we`ve invested only R63 million out of a R240 million fund," says Pretorius."We don`t necessarily look for the latest hot technology trends to invest in, but are looking for companies with management we believe can manoeuvre in these difficult times, backed up by a strong technology component. We just can`t compare ourselves to Europe and the US where there are more professional managers available," says Johns. "There are, however, some companies out there that meet our criteria and some good opportunities for deal-flow coming up."Out of the ashesA number of new companies have been formed through management buyouts of subsidiaries and divisions of crumbling empires such as AST, Global Technology and MGX - a trend private equity players find encouraging.Unburdened by the debt and bureaucracy they faced as part of larger parent groups, these new businesses are moving quickly to forge credible ties with black empowerment partners and to bring new capital in to fund growth."The market is still tough for young companies, but we`re starting to see some encouraging signs, like people breaking away from larger IT groups to set up their own businesses," says Pretorius. "We`re dealing a lot with entrepreneurs who have become frustrated with the corporate world, and that`s good because they bring a wealth of experience into their new ventures."One such company is Software Futures, which seems to be recuperating well after its split from the beleaguered MGX group. The company reports that it has secured several major deals, one of which is the largest yet in its almost 10-year existence since it was bought out of its parent group by a consortium made up of management, Cape-based structured finance house Brown Brother Holdings and Kopano ke Matla Investment Company, an investment arm of Cosatu.A combination of a cash injection from its new owners and improved black economic empowerment credentials all contributed towards an improvement in Software Futures` performance."September was a turning point in our business, as the positive effects of the sale of Software Futures to Kopano Ke Matla were reflected in major sales upturns in several business units. These divisions previously struggled under the burden of institutional risk and negative market conditions," says Arthur Brown, the recently appointed MD of Software Futures.One insider was less diplomatic: "We just weren`t doing any business while the trouble was going on," he confided.Valuations lag expectationsAs yet, the activity in the market is not reflected in the valuations of IT companies, although most investors hope that this will start changing next year. "It`s more of a buyer`s market than a seller`s market," says Johns."The market is starting to move in the right direction and next year we`ll start to see valuations improve. For now, we`d rather work with our businesses and build their operational capacity. Things like IPOs are still a long way out," says Williams. "Alt-X [the JSE`s alternative exchange for small capitalisation companies] isn`t really an option at this stage - there is no appetite for that sort of risk."Pretorius agrees: "We don`t think that Alt-X is going to get much institutional support in the short-term. Too many people have memories of losing money on small companies without the right corporate governance in place during the last boom." Shakeout survivors primed for growthMost of the survivors of a four-year long shakeout of the JSE Securities Exchange technology sector look in good shape to take advantage of an expected upturn in IT spending in 2004. (For separate comment on the small cap IT sector, see Looking good, but the rand factor weighs, page 71).However, there is still plenty of scope for further consolidation of the market, particularly through black economic empowerment-related transactions.At the risk of sounding predictable, the group that looks best positioned for the future is Comparex Africa, which has proven resilient enough to survive trials that would have buried lesser companies.Comparex was forced to start restructuring and take costs out of its businesses a good two years ahead of most of its peers after it was created through a messy merger between Persetel and Q Data. More recently, Comparex managed to shake itself free of its loss-making, low-margin European businesses.With the recent conclusion of a merger with black empowerment Microsoft reseller Business Connexion, Comparex is on an enviable footing for the future.Looking very strongUnder terms of the deal, which had no empowerment discount, Business Connexion will be folded into Comparex in exchange for an 11.8 percent stake. Business Connexion will pay R117 million to bring its stake in Comparex up to 25 percent, funded by a loan from Comparex that is repayable with interest.Irnest Kaplan of Kaplan Equity Analysts, who assisted Brainstorm with some balance sheet analysis, rates Comparex as very strong, given its cash balance of some R2.2 billion and rather less long-term debt (R240 million).But now that the empowerment deal is done, Comparex will be distributing most of the cash pile it has jealously guarded for several years to its shareholders, although it will retain R600 million for working capital and in case it loses a long-running dispute with the taxman.Still, Kaplan says, it is turning around operationally, and is showing positive cash flow from operations.Only a handful of JSE-listed systems integrators - like CS Holdings and Datacentrix - can now compete with Comparex`s empowerment credentials, and they do not have nearly the reach or capacity of their larger competitor. The Comparex/Business Connexion merger creates a R3 billion-a-year ICT giant that employs more than 4 000 people.According to Benjamin Mophatlane, CEO of Business Connexion, and Peter Watt, CEO of Comparex, the deal differs from many previous empowerment deals in that it is not just an equity transaction. "Business Connexion is a functioning business, meaning we can address the operational side of empowerment too, including the customer interface."Many of the tailwinds driving Comparex/Business Connexion will drive others in the sector too. Watt says some "serious decisions" will have to be made in 2005, noting that current systems are taking a lot of strain nearly five years after the last big money was spent on IT."We are confident there will be another wave of spending, and that mobile and the Microsoft environment will be central to that," says Watt.Figures from BMI-Techknowledge back this up. In PC Computing Forecast and Analysis 2002 to 2007, published earlier this year, it noted that mobile computing growth was tracking at over 40 percent, compared to around five percent annual unit shipment growth predicted for PCs for 2004.Upping the anteThe Comparex deal effectively ups the ante for the likes of Dimension Data and AST, who have been long on talk about black empowerment but short on delivering the deals their customers and shareholders are demanding. Expect to see more transactions along the lines of the Business Connexion and Comparex merger in the year to come.While critics may argue that such deals merely result in entrepreneurial black-owned companies being swallowed by larger white-owned groups, the reality is that the small black businesses need the transactions as badly as the JSE-listed companies do. Besides, any trend that sees traditionally white and emerging black IT companies start to merge in the mainstream rather than continue to develop in separate ghettoes can only be good for the industry.It`s also encouraging to see that a few of the small fry of the nineties listings boom have grown into significant players in the local IT landscape and credible competitors to the likes of Dimension Data and Comparex.Examples include the likes of ERP.com, UCS Group, Datacentrix and Paracon, all of which have grown into businesses worth more than R100 million a year through a mixture of organic and acquisitive growth and all of them with solid track records and sound financial management.UCS, according to Kaplan, has a very strong balance sheet with almost no debt and good ratios. Operationally it performs well, and shows positive cash flow. Datacentrix, Paracon and ERP.com are likewise sitting on very strong balance sheets, having avoided debt, accumulated cash and shown strong operational growth and cash flow.Still healthy but weaker due to higher debt or disappointing operational performance, according to Kaplan`s analysis, are companies such as CS Holdings, Faritec and EOH.Among the larger listed groups, hardware distributor Mustek and diversified electronics and ICT group Altron both continue to turn in solid performances in a turbulent market.Although PC sales were slow in its last financial year, Mustek managed to lift operating profit from R202 million to R213 million on sales that increased a mere two percent to R2.2 billion. Cash generated from operations was also impressive, with cash on hand increasing from R229 million to more than R430 million. During the year, subsidiary Rectron, which was shunned by investors as an independently listed company, grew sales to around R1.2 billion.The outlook for the hardware market is uncertain, however. Like many of its peers in the PC, components and peripherals distribution game, Mustek has to shift ever more boxes to keep rand revenues constant as a result of falling PC prices and a stronger rand.In addition, the pricing differential between international brands and local brands such as Mustek continues to narrow and controversy continues to rage about government departments specifying that respondents to their tenders need to be international tier-one brands.Government connectionMustek`s recent conclusion of an empowerment deal that entitles Safika Holdings acquire up to 25 percent plus one share of the group over five years should help the group defend and extend its business in the government sphere, however.Altron, which counts listed companies Bytes Technology Group (BTG) and Altech among its subsidiaries, managed to push headline earnings per share up by more than 10 percent in its latest set of interim results. That increase in earnings came despite restructuring that pushed revenues down to R5 billion from R6.2 billion in the comparable period of the previous year.At the time of reporting its interim results, Altron was in the enviable position of having cash and cash equivalents of R1.6 billion.Of the two listed IT subsidiaries in the Altron stable, it is Altech that performed most impressively during the interim period. Revenue and operating profit for the continuing operations increased by 8.5 percent and 6.5 percent to almost R2 billion and R160 million respectively. Altech`s cash and cash equivalents increased to an amount in excess of R1.2 billion.BTG`s operating profit declined by 2.4 percent to R77 million as a result of a disappointing performance from its UK operations, which was also the major reason for a 25 percent drop in the group`s revenues. However, BTG management has promised a turnaround by the next financial year, and its balance sheet remains fairly healthy, with R190 million in cash and R249 million of long-term debt.The market`s big losers in the short term appear to be those with a strong offshore orientation, like Dimension Data and Datatec. Despite strong balance sheets with plenty cash to cover debt, both have both been clobbered by foreign exchange losses due to the strengthening of the rand this year, and have performed poorly from an operational point of view. (Didata`s latest results are covered in a separate news analysis, p.18.)Transparently sensibleAlthough Datatec is a well-managed distribution group and has done as good a job as could be expected of managing its margins in a depressed market for the networking hardware it sells, the weakness of the rand has partially masked unexciting revenue and profit growth in real (dollar) terms over the past two financial years. Unlike Didata on two counts, Datatec did report a profit, but could not generate positive cash flow from operations either.The decision to adopt US dollar-based financial reporting, announced with Datatec`s last set of interim results, will make its figures more transparent for both local and international investors. The move makes enormous sense since Datatec derives more than 90 percent of its revenues offshore, with a large portion of its sales coming from the US.Jeremy Ord, Didata`s executive chairman, reports good-looking order books. "There are signs in all regions that demand has stabilised, as has pricing pressure from vendors. Touch wood. Let`s hope it stays that way. Recent customer wins suggest traction in demand for solutions."In turnaround modeA host of companies are still in the midst of their turnaround strategies. A question mark still hangs over CS Holdings, one of the larger listed second-tier systems integrators.In its last financial year, the group`s operating profit sagged to its first ever loss of R25 million even as revenues climbed from R403 million to R430 million. The group`s cash on hand fell from R31 million to R26 million while current liabilities increased to R159 million from R121 million.CS Holdings ascribed these woes to growing pains from the integration of acquired businesses into its fold, and promises a return to profitability in the new financial year.On a more positive note, CS Holdings has managed to build a good empowerment profile by selling a 25.8 percent stake to Worldwide African Investment Holdings and has also forged business partnerships with powerful market players such as Telkom.Only time will tell whether last year`s poor performance was a once-off event, or whether it points to more fundamental problems with CS Holdings` strategy of rapid growth by acquisition. Critics of this aggressive strategy probably feel somewhat vindicated, but investors and customers, so far, have shown faith in the group.CS Holdings also brought electronics group Reunert on board as a new shareholder after the latter bought a 31.7 percent stake in the group from Dutch company Getronics and Electra Share Ventures.Problem childAn even more troubled child of the late nineties boom is debt-laden IT services group AST. Management has shown laudable commitment to doing whatever it takes to turn the troubled group around, but one still wonders whether AST will be able to shake off its debt burden or whether it will follow the likes of MGX into oblivion.Directors at AST have managed to find cost savings of more than R200 million a year and have moved quickly to unload non-core and unprofitable business units. But at the end of the last financial year AST still had liabilities of more than R728 million.Since then, restructuring, recapitalisation and cash raised from selling off businesses has helped AST cut its debt by a further R90 million, and it has managed to reschedule some payments. The group has also managed to win large new deals or extend existing services contracts with customers such as Iscor, Kumba and Columbus Steel.Nonetheless, like MGX before it, AST could eventually find itself in a position where it needs to sell its crown jewels for a pittance simply to keep going. There`s also concern that the group will find itself strapped for resources after mass retrenchments in the last financial year.A proposed takeover of the group by parastatal arivia.kom could well be the best outcome for AST`s shareholders, depending on how much arivia is willing to pay for it.But it would be sad to sit on the verge of a new growth period only to watch a final victim of the boom-bust cycle succumb to a bailout by nationalisation.With additional reporting by Patrick Lawlor and Ivo Vegter.

Your Majesty, the CIO

Five years ago, they were the über-geeks who kept Big Business`s computer systems up and running. Now CIOs are emerging from the basement to become business-savvy strategic players with the power to shape the future – of companies, of vendors, of the entire IT industry, for that matter.Some would say this Clark Kent-like transformation is purely a matter of survival, and CIOs who don`t get strategic fairly quickly will find themselves out in the cold. But the fact remains that CIOs have a remarkable vantage point from which to view the workings of their companies – providing a compelling power base from which to be significant strategic players.What`s more, today`s CIOs already hold the destiny of the IT industry in their hands to a greater degree than they may realise. Under pressure from their CEOs and shareholders, they`re demanding more from their existing IT systems, and are turning their rands over before making any major new investments. What this means is that the tech buying cycle will only restart when the CIOs decide it will. And right now they`re not buying.Of course, this blurring of the lines between business and IT has been a long time coming. Some analysts talk of the importance of aligning business and IT, but it goes further than that. The bottom line is that we live in the Information Age – and it`s driven by IT. Extra hatsThe penny has already dropped for some. At petro-chemical giant Sasol, for example, CIO Alex Zwiegelaar is at pains to talk not about technology, but information.“What is information? Why do you have it? What do you do with it? More specifically, how do you use it for your customers? IT`s value should be immediately obvious as an enabler of business processes.”At banking giant Absa, too, IT group executive Leon du Rand has overseen a shift in emphasis away from IT to a more business-focused information services (IS) approach which has seen business confidence in Absa Group IT rise from 54 percent in 2000 to 73 percent last year. Does it make business sense? Without a doubt. But, in the process, the canny CIO is also ensuring his longevity.“A CIO is uniquely positioned in any business today, because there is not a single element of business that does not require information,” concedes Du Rand. “But we also need to be able to see opportunities and go out into the business area.”Microsoft CIO Rick Devenuti encapsulates the new approach when he says he`s working toward a time when “the IT people” are so fully woven into the day-to-day business and culture of the lines of business that they become highly focused business people, but with a special talent for technology.That`s still some way off. For now, though, companies that are looking to make the most of technology, and are using it to improve or transform their businesses, are widening the scope of the CIOs to such areas as marketing, sales, mergers and acquisitions and partnerships.That`s a lot of extra hats, but it comes with the territory. Jenny Retief, who was CIO of Hollard Insurance until last year, certainly believes the CIO of the future will have to be Superman or Superwoman to keep up with the varied roles.“You have to be able to understand the business you`re in and the overall business strategy of the firm. You must understand the challenges facing the business, and be a partner in setting strategy. And then you have to apply the appropriate IT solutions to support, enable, drive and grow the business,” says Retief, who is consulting to Hollard while on sabbatical.Du Rand agrees that today`s CIO is far more of a strategic animal than ever before, but also far more diverse. “There are basically four roles the CIO has to play: that of strategist, business adviser, IT executive and systems architect,” says Du Rand. Splitting the CIO and CTO“It`s important that the CIO helps the organisation understand strategy from the technology side of the fence. Now that we`ve moved into the era of the networked economy, a CIO must understand trends, and must have the ability to leverage what you already have in place.”It`s clear, though, that the modern CIO might spend more than half his time on his organisation`s purchasing, marketing, sales, operations, strategy and product-development decisions, and far less time on the traditional CIO role of managing the systems, says Du Rand.Does this trend herald the advent of a totally new beast in the corporate hierarchy, the chief technology officer (CTO)? It`s not too far off, predicts Du Rand – with the CTO becoming involved in issues like vendor management, technology selection and procurement, while the CIO focuses on the alignment of business IT and finding ways to streamline business processes.Michael Earl, a professor of information management at the London Business School, has long advocated a splitting of the CIO and CTO roles. In Earl`s world, the CIO will be the systems strategist, the business strategist and maybe the information and knowledge custodian, while the CTO will be the service provider and make technology policy. Or, as he puts it: “The CTO will be the guardian of the current business, while the CIO will be the guardian of future business.“The CTO would be more of a pure technologist who has a programming base at heart and delivers the technology tools that make the company more efficient,” says a Pretoria-based IT director in the financial services arena. “The CTO develops new technologies, and the CIO implements them within the framework of what`s best for the business.”An emphasis on execution certainly seems to apply to Hankie Vogel, the CIO at Medscheme, the Bryanston-based medical fund administrator. “I don`t think the CIO should be strategic at all,” he says, gleefully swimming against the stream.“My job is to make certain, from a technology standpoint, that we are focusing on implementing those technologies, those processes, those capabilities that are going to make our shareholders happier and our company more successful,” he says.Indeed, Vogel feels that in virtually any company in any industry the CIO`s primary role is to ensure that technology is being used “in the most effective fashion” and that it is a competitive advantage.“Obviously as CIO you`re not going to be able to align with company strategy unless you understand it. And you`re not going to be able to understand it unless you are fully privy to what is trying to be accomplished, being involved in sales-support efforts and talking with customers to see what some of their needs are,” says Vogel.“But, at the end of the day, I`m there to provide the optimum solution for the company in terms of cost, time and risk.”Despite the ascent from the basement to the boardroom, CIOs still have work to do to make themselves indispensable. Indeed, many fall short of CEO expectations – to the extent that some doomsayers foretell the demise of the CIO as we know it. The dinosaur routeOne view is that, as companies increasingly understand how best to utilise information to enhance business effectiveness, the CIO role will wither and die naturally. They have a point. If IT management becomes little more than telephone systems or electricity management, then it`s sayonara to the CIO. After all, you don`t exactly find a plethora of chief telephone officers or chief electricity officers, do you?And the reputation of CIOs as a species has hardly been enhanced by the fact that companies across the world have lost millions of dollars on failed or unnecessary technology. How much is hard to quantify. Suffice to say that a recent Gartner/Morgan Stanley study of 25 years of tech spending estimates that US companies lost $130 billion on unnecessary software and hardware in the past two years alone.Worldwide, says London-based Gartner research director Andy Kyte, who was in South Africa late last year on a SAP junket, companies waste as much as 20 percent of the $2.7 trillion spent on technology – thanks to project delays and needless purchases.It`s enough to make a CIO shudder – and send the CEO scuttling to outsource as much of his IT operation as he humanly can.Why the appalling track record? Sometimes guided by the CIO, sometimes not, a lot of companies latched onto the wrong technology, bought too much shelfware and didn`t implement new technology properly. They also underestimated the time and levels of change needed to make it all work. And CEOs, especially during the tech-boom years, often drove spending for projects without clear goals.“People viewed technology then as black magic, so why understand it,” says US-based analyst Charles Phillips, an MD at Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co, who heads up a monthly round table of 300 CIOs from global companies, in a recent interview with Computerworld magazine. “We became fascinated by technology and stopped thinking.”Judging by the responses from South African CIOs, most brains have been re-engaged. The new mantra, by all accounts, is short and sweet: show me the money. Absa has a powerful committee-driven governance system which nitpicks each and every proposal for IT spend; while at banking rival First National Bank, IT is a profit centre just like every other business unit in the FirstRand Group.“In the heydays of the `90s, IT spending was much more based on gut feel,” says Absa`s Du Rand. “Now, with business driving technology more and more, we`ve got to look at strategic fit, assess the risk and see that the numbers make sense.”Some companies are trying to recover some of their investments and improve technology`s “bang for the buck” by thinking more strategically, installing a business person as CIO, or kicking their CIOs upstairs, making them part of the executive team to more closely align technology goals to business strategy and avoid wasted spending.But there`s also growing evidence that other organisations are moving in the opposite direction, outsourcing what they can and reducing the size of their IT departments. This growing outsourcing trend should send a wake-up call to the middle-of-the-road CIO who`s not getting involved at the highest levels of business strategy, and runs the very real risk of losing control over parts of the technology budget.In a recent interview with CIO Insight magazine, John Parkinson, chief technologist for Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, says CIOs have basically two choices. “There are two viable roles for the CIO going forward: upward as a peer with the executive team contributing directly to executive business strategy, or as a line manager of technology, who will eventually be outsourced.”So how does the average CIO tighten his or her grip on the reins of corporate – and financial – power? It`s not enough that they`re still the key technology buyers. As FNB`s Adolph Kaestner told Brainstorm six months ago, it`s all about negotiating with business units and showing them value. “As specific business departments become more familiar with IT and what it can do for the business, they won`t necessarily turn to a centralised IT department unless they`re convinced the people in IT are working directly for their interests.”The unspoken threat is that CIOs will have to fight increasingly for the business of the in-house business unit, competing against outside vendors.Don`t tell that to Sasol`s Zwiegelaar, though. He has boldly outsourced most of his company`s service provision and technology components, is partnering with outside companies on some projects and is reducing total cost of ownership (the dreaded TCO) across the board by standardising on hardware and software.“It`s all about cost of ownership and effectiveness,” an unconcerned Zwiegelaar told Brainstorm. “We`ve built a business case where you can save a lot of money by standardising.”Amen to that, says Medscheme`s Vogel, who takes a very simple approach to spending money: “If it doesn`t change the business process, then the investment is wasted. It`s all very well automating, but you`ve got to automate the right things. Technology isn`t going to help if the business isn`t right. It simply gets you to the wrong answer faster.” So where is the money?All this talk of spending money is bound to get IT vendors licking their lips. Don`t hold your breath, warns Hollard`s Retief: most CIOs are still looking to squeeze what they can from their existing systems before venturing into the marketplace. And when they do, they`ll be expecting immediate, easily measurable business benefits. Overall, the spending prognosis remains cautious, with the faintest hint of an upturn towards the end of 2003.Medscheme, for one, is making no big ticket purchases this year after a couple of years of heavy investment. “We`re looking to optimise and consolidate in 2003,” says Vogel. “It`s time for us to capitalise on the investments we`ve already made, and to a large extent they`re delivering returns already.”The news is more encouraging at Absa, where the IT budget for the next financial year shows a single figure increase after three successive years of cuts. The investments, says Du Rand, will be mainly in infrastructure as the banking group “e-prepares” its extensive branch network.“We`ve been through a trough of disillusionment, but organisations must still position themselves for the future,” said Du Rand. “The IBMs and Ciscos of this world are doing huge amounts of business on the Internet, and it would be silly to ignore that. As far as trends go, I expect many CIOs to start looking closely at the so-called ‘composite apps` this year, and you just can`t ignore the growing shift towards open source.”So is the South African CIO king of all he surveys, or is he at the crossroads?It all depends on their approach. They would probably do well to heed a fascinating piece of research by the CSC Foundation, which found that high influence CIOs are much more likely to have a personal and social relationship with the CEO.In other words, the successful CIO doesn`t need an MBA. It`s far more effective to have a deep understanding of technology and be able to communicate its challenges and possibilities effectively at the very top of the organisation. Indeed, some CEOs are upgrading the job of the CIO so as to foster greater co-operation between IT and the business.“CEOs want someone who understands the business challenges and how technology can solve them,” says Medscheme`s Vogel. Take the gapAn intriguing circle of influence emerges: a CIO with a close relationship with the CEO is likely to know about and influence new business initiatives early, which increases the chances of the IT organisation responding effectively. An effective IT response, of course, increases the success rate and, possibly, preserves the close link to the CEO. Ah, the magic of corporate politics.Still, best buddies with the CEO or not, there are some IT experts who feel the CIO is here to stay – if for no other reason that IT is not going to go away. Line managers don`t always have the financial or technical background needed to take over IT decision-making. When the economy turns, you want the CIO to be investing in opportunities – and overseeing IT investments – to assure the best impact for the business.What`s more, it`s worth reiterating that the CIO has a bird`s-eye view of the company that few others do. Regardless of outsourcing trends, many CIOs are in a great position to assert themselves as the key technology strategist liaison between third-party outsourcers and the corporate boardroom.The message to CIOs seems clear. Use your position wisely. Embrace technology, but only to advance the business. Get strategic at the highest levels.In short: if you`re ready to take the opportunities, there has never been a better time to be a CIO. Your carriage awaits, Your Majesty.